Ought to we ban leasehold property?


When is a home-owner not a home-owner? After they personal their property on a leasehold foundation.

There’s a lot at fault with the leasehold system, it has taken the Legislation Fee over 850 pages to handle its shortcomings in a report revealed this week.

Property consultants assume the federal government will (ultimately) enact lots of the instructed reforms in what is alleged to be the most important shake-up for residential property since Margaret Thatcher’s “Proper to Purchase” within the 1980s.

This appears like nice information for the 4m leaseholders in England and Wales — of which I’m one — however property buyers can console themselves that it’s prone to be a few years earlier than something modifications.

First, a historical past lesson. The legal guidelines regarding property tenure in England and Wales have their roots within the feudal system. As you may anticipate, this doesn’t bode effectively for these on the backside of the pile.

The freeholder has the authorized proper to personal the land or property in perpetuity; the leaseholder merely owns the lease — paying for the precise to occupy their dwelling for a set interval, usually 99 or 125 years.

The costs of leasehold properties aren’t precisely low-cost, however you’re additionally liable to pay every kind of additional fees to freeholders. Should you dwell in a block of flats, having a mechanism for paying for the maintenance of the frequent components is sensible. But over the previous decade, housebuilders have routinely been promoting new construct homes on a leasehold foundation; certainly one of many ruses to wring extra money out of leaseholders.

From a freeholder’s viewpoint, the perfect factor about granting a lease is that it runs out. They will revenue once more by charging to increase it. If there’s lower than 80 years left to run, they will additionally make leaseholders pay half of the anticipated uplift within the property’s value — referred to as the “marriage worth” (presumably as a result of it prices a fortune and makes folks cry).

Freeholders additionally levy an annual service cost to pay for the administration and upkeep of the event and its grounds. It is rather exhausting for leaseholders to problem the dimensions of those payments (and belief me, they solely ever enhance). Leaseholders can even face one-off calls for to fund particular works. After the Grenfell catastrophe, leaseholders of flats with flammable exterior cladding have been discovering this out the exhausting manner. Some face six-figure payments, or discover their flats are unsellable.

Then there’s the bottom hire. Historically, this was a nominal sum. However some grasping builders had been sneaking clauses into leases so the bottom rents doubled each decade. A purchaser of a brand new leasehold property won’t quibble over an annual floor hire of £300, however after 50 years, they may face payments of £10,000 a yr — an issue many leaseholders solely uncover once they wrestle to promote their houses. These caught with such onerous phrases are referred to as “leasehold prisoners”.

The housebuilders have been shamed into stopping the bottom rents wheeze, however final yr’s promised ban on promoting new leasehold homes has but to turn into legislation. In any case, says Graham Pack, a chartered surveyor who advises on leasehold points, round 1.4m leasehold homes have already been constructed. In addition to promoting these at excessive values, builders get a second chew of the cherry by promoting the freeholds and their profitable revenue stream to buyers.

Leaseholders report being charged extreme “admin charges” to acquire permission to hold out probably the most fundamental renovations. You may anticipate this for main works like constructing an extension — however not, as client group Which? has discovered, being charged £60 for permission to exchange a doorbell, or £300 to erect a fence.

If leaseholders wish to break away of those chains, they’ve the precise to “enfranchise” — successfully shopping for out the freeholder. As with extending your lease, it is a difficult and costly process.

Even when they will afford to pay, leaseholders may also be answerable for all the landlord’s authorized and surveying prices — sufficient to place many individuals off making an attempt.

So it shouldn’t shock you that the Legislation Fee desires to brush away the above excesses by recommending that for all future gross sales, leasehold is changed by an present however little-used different tenure referred to as “commonhold” (assume 990-year leases and no floor rents).

This leaves the issue of what to do with the 4m present leasehold properties. The report primarily recommends making it simpler and cheaper for leaseholders to enfranchise and purchase out the bottom hire, or lengthen their lease to 990 years.

Roarie Scarisbrick, a property shopping for agent, says this isn’t a “silver bullet” for present leaseholders. He factors out that round 50 separate items of laws would have to be handed for these modifications to occur, relying on whether or not authorities goes all the best way and bans leasehold in favour of commonhold, or comes up with new incentives for commonhold whereas permitting leasehold to proceed.

He and different consultants imagine there may be the political want to reform this historical and clunky system — notably as the federal government’s Assist to Purchase initiative has enabled the sale of billions of kilos’ value of leasehold flats and homes to younger households. The issue is the dearth of parliamentary time.

It has taken two years simply to provide this evaluate. The federal government is now “contemplating” it, however what number of extra years will it take for any of this to turn into legislative actuality? It doesn’t look possible on this parliament — and that’s earlier than you take into account the pressures of Brexit and coronavirus.

And what might any reforms imply for future property costs?

Relying on how cleanly this laws is enacted, there are risks of making a two-tier system. If I promote my flat sooner or later, I foresee having to pay to increase my lease to 990 years as this it what consumers would get in the event that they purchased a brand new construct flat subsequent door.

Leasehold has been a pleasant little earner for the main housebuilders. Share costs slipped on the day the report was revealed (reflecting the risk to future profitability) however not by very a lot (reflecting the issue of unpicking the present laws). I anticipate builders will make a whole lot of noise about future housebuilding targets being missed, and demand that costs of recent construct houses should enhance. Good luck with that.

I’ve extra sympathy for accountable freeholders (sure, they do exist). Making lease extensions and enfranchisement cheaper and simpler means the worth of their property property will fall and so they face a higher threat of dropping management of them altogether.

The greediest builders might have triggered the problem of reform, however freeholders might find yourself hurting extra. Crying “it’s not honest”, nevertheless, will solely elicit wry smiles from leaseholders, who’ve been saying precisely that for years. 

Claer Barrett is the editor of FT Cash, and a monetary commentator on Eddie Mair’s LBC drive-time present, on weekdays between 4-6pm: claer.barrett@ft.com; Twitter @Claerb; Instagram @Claerb


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here