Ocado says robotic patent case ‘might hurt public well being’


Ocado has hit again towards the prospect of a US investigation into claims that its expertise infringed patents, warning that such a probe might hurt public well being in the course of the Covid-19 pandemic.

The US Worldwide Commerce Fee stated on Monday that it could open an investigation into allegations that Ocado’s Good Platform (OSP) infringed patents held by Norwegian warehouse automation firm AutoStore.

AutoStore has requested the ITC to stop Ocado from importing British-made robots and different elements central to its system into the US.

If granted, the request might halt the rollout of Ocado’s platform at Kroger, the US grocery store chain that’s the UK group’s largest company buyer. The 2 firms reached a landmark settlement in 2018 to construct and match out 20 automated distribution centres throughout the US.

The primary is because of open in Ohio early subsequent 12 months, with two extra to observe later in 2021. In a submission forward of the ITC’s choice, attorneys for Ocado stated the Covid-19 pandemic “will nearly actually nonetheless be a difficulty within the US” on this timeframe — despite the fact that fulfilment centres usually take not less than a number of months to succeed in capability.

“With many People solely leaving their houses for important gadgets, shopping for groceries has turn into harder,” they continued, including that the corporate’s expertise “may help to deal with the large enhance in [online] demand”.

The attorneys added that an investigation “might be deleterious to public well being, security and welfare within the US” in the course of the pandemic.

The Ocado Good Platform, an built-in system of {hardware} and software program, makes use of robots to choose grocery orders from inside automated fulfilment centres far faster than people can choose them.

Developed for Ocado’s use, the expertise has been offered to grocery store teams together with Aeon in Japan, Coles in Australia, Sobey’s in Canada and Monoprix in France.

Ocado’s attorneys additionally argued that on-line grocery supply might assist alleviate so-called “meals deserts”, the place entry to wholesome meals was restricted. It identified that Kroger deliberate to open fulfilment centres in such areas and accepted federal help advantages towards meals purchases on-line.

“Excluding the OSP from the US market . . . will hurt the flexibility of US customers, particularly customers in underserved communities, to acquire wholesome and inexpensive meals and likewise will hurt Kroger’s potential to compete with established on-line grocers,” it stated.

Kroger, which isn’t a celebration to the infringement case, filed an analogous assertion with the ITC, highlighting the potential for job creation throughout a recession in addition to bettering entry to inexpensive meals.

The civil case introduced by AutoStore within the US towards Ocado now seems prone to be paused pending the result of the ITC investigation.

Ocado declined to remark. It has beforehand stated it was “not conscious of any infringement” of AutoStore’s rights.

The anticipated future royalty earnings from greater than 50 fulfilment centres that Ocado has contracted to suit out is what underpins the FTSE 100 group’s £19bn market worth. The authorized manoeuvring has to date not affected its shares, that are little modified since early October when the AutoStore criticism was filed.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here